Sharp Echo — 2 certified H-1B filings (FY2016–FY2019)
- 1
- Filings · FY2019
- $94k
- Median base · FY2019
- Lead Developer
- Top role · 1 all-time
- TX
- Top state · 2 all-time
Sharp Echo filed 1 certified H-1B LCAs in FY2019, with a median base salary of $94k and the middle 50% of offers between $94k and $94k. Across all years it has 2 certified filings since FY2016, most often for Lead Developer in Texas.
How much does Sharp Echo pay H-1B workers?
Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $94k median in FY2019. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
How has Sharp Echo's H-1B hiring changed by year?
1 certified filings in FY2016 → 1 in FY2019. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2019 | 1 | 0% | $94k |
| FY2016 | 1 | — | $110k |
Which wage levels does Sharp Echo file?
DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 0% of Sharp Echo's filings sit at Level III–IV. A heavy I–II skew reads as entry-level or contractor-style hiring; a heavy IV skew as senior in-house roles — and higher levels earn more lottery entries.
Share of 1 filings with a wage level · all years
- Level II100.0%1
What jobs does Sharp Echo sponsor for H-1B?
The most-filed job titles across all years (DOL titles, employer pay-grade codes stripped), with base-salary percentiles.
| Job title | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Lead Developer | 1 | $94k |
| Product Delivery Manager | 1 | $110k |
Where does Sharp Echo hire H-1B workers?
Worksite states on the certified filings, all years. Deeper pink = more filings; hover a state for its figures.
| State | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| TX | 2 | $94k |
What has Sharp Echo filed recently?
Every certified LCA on record for Sharp Echo: job title, worksite, prevailing-wage level and the offered base salary.
| FY | Job title | Base salary |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Lead Developer | $93,538 |
| 2016 | Product Delivery Manager | $110,000 |
Common questions about Sharp Echo's H-1B filings
- How much does Sharp Echo pay H-1B workers?
- Sharp Echo's median certified H-1B base salary is $94k (FY2019), from 1 filings. See the full salary distribution and percentiles above.
- How many H-1B workers does Sharp Echo sponsor?
- Sharp Echo has 2 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications on record (FY2016–FY2019).
- What jobs does Sharp Echo sponsor for H-1B?
- Sharp Echo's most-sponsored H-1B roles include Lead Developer, Product Delivery Manager.
- Where does Sharp Echo hire H-1B workers?
- Sharp Echo's top H-1B worksite states are TX.
- Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
- The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2019). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →