Scheduler H-1B salaries — 135 certified filings (FY2016–FY2026)

19
Filings · FY2025
$111k
Median base · FY2025
$105k–$132k
Middle 50% · FY2025
Cumming Management Group
Top sponsor · 30 all-time
FY

Scheduler: 135 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. In FY2025 the median base salary was $111k across 19 filings, with the middle 50% of offers between $105k and $132k. The biggest sponsors are Cumming Management Group, Kiewit Engineering Group, O Connor Construction Management; most filings are in New York, NY.

How much does a Scheduler make on an H-1B?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $111k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$25k$50k$75k$100k$125k$150k$175k’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26

How has Scheduler sponsorship changed?

4 certified filings in FY2016 → 23 in FY2026. The change column is each year against the one before.

Scheduler certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY202623+21%$104k
FY202519−5%$111k
FY202420+43%$117k
FY202314−7%$115k
FY202215+36%$120k
FY202111+22%$115k
FY20209+50%$95k
FY20196−33%$80k
FY20189+80%$96k
FY20175+25%$80k
FY20164—$65k

Which companies sponsor H-1B Schedulers?

The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.

Top H-1B sponsors for Scheduler
#EmployerFilingsMedian base
1Cumming Management Group30$126k
2Kiewit Engineering Group7$100k
3O Connor Construction Management7$110k
4Hill International6$120k
5Dpr Construction a General Partnership5$121k
6Apsi Construction Management4$101k
7W G Yates and Sons Construction4$100k
8Group Pmx4$115k
9Trenmor4$102k
10Technip USA3$72k

Where are H-1B Scheduler jobs located?

Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.

Top worksite cities for H-1B Scheduler roles
#CityFilingsMedian base
1New York, NY9$126k
2Lone Tree, CO7$97k
3Los Angeles, CA5$121k
4Atlanta, GA5$130k
5Dallas, TX5$108k
6Irvine, CA4$110k
7Phoenix, AZ3$76k
8Houston, TX3$72k
9San Francisco, CA3$124k
10San Diego, CA3$110k

Common questions about Scheduler H-1B salaries

What is the median H-1B salary for a Scheduler?
The median certified H-1B base salary for Scheduler is $111k (FY2025), from 19 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $90k and $124k.
Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Schedulers?
The top H-1B sponsors for Scheduler are Cumming Management Group, Kiewit Engineering Group, O Connor Construction Management.
Where are most H-1B Scheduler jobs located?
The top worksite locations for H-1B Scheduler roles are New York, NY, Lone Tree, CO, Los Angeles, CA.
Does a certified LCA mean Scheduler H-1B visas were approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What does the fiscal year mean here?
Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.

Keep exploring

Browse all job titles →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2026). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →