ASIC Design Verification Engineer III H-1B salaries — 88 certified filings (FY2016–FY2021)
- 88
- Filings · all years
- $134k
- Median base · all years
- $128k–$140k
- Middle 50% · all years
- Aricent N A
- Top sponsor · 65 all-time
ASIC Design Verification Engineer III: 88 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. The all-years median base salary is $134k (middle 50%: $128k–$140k). The biggest sponsors are Aricent N A, Smartplay; most filings are in San Jose, CA.
How much does a ASIC Design Verification Engineer III make on an H-1B?
Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $134k median in all years. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
How has ASIC Design Verification Engineer III sponsorship changed?
49 certified filings in FY2016 → 3 in FY2021. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021 | 3 | −40% | $138k |
| FY2020 | 5 | −17% | $140k |
| FY2019 | 6 | −33% | $135k |
| FY2018 | 9 | −44% | $134k |
| FY2017 | 16 | −67% | $132k |
| FY2016 | 49 | — | $135k |
Which companies sponsor H-1B ASIC Design Verification Engineer IIIs?
The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.
| # | Employer | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aricent N A | 65 | $134k |
| 2 | Smartplay | 23 | $135k |
Where are H-1B ASIC Design Verification Engineer III jobs located?
Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.
| # | City | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Jose, CA | 39 | $135k |
| 2 | Santa Clara, CA | 14 | $134k |
| 3 | Hudson, MA | 11 | $135k |
| 4 | San Diego, CA | 10 | $135k |
| 5 | Hillsboro, OR | 5 | $132k |
| 6 | Chandler, AZ | 2 | $115k |
| 7 | Menlo Park, CA | 2 | $107k |
| 8 | Mountain View, CA | 1 | $132k |
| 9 | Shrewsbury, MA | 1 | $138k |
| 10 | Boxborough, MA | 1 | $130k |
Common questions about ASIC Design Verification Engineer III H-1B salaries
- What is the median H-1B salary for a ASIC Design Verification Engineer III?
- The median certified H-1B base salary for ASIC Design Verification Engineer III is $134k (all years), from 88 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $128k and $140k.
- Which companies sponsor the most H-1B ASIC Design Verification Engineer IIIs?
- The top H-1B sponsors for ASIC Design Verification Engineer III are Aricent N A, Smartplay.
- Where are most H-1B ASIC Design Verification Engineer III jobs located?
- The top worksite locations for H-1B ASIC Design Verification Engineer III roles are San Jose, CA, Santa Clara, CA, Hudson, MA.
- Does a certified LCA mean ASIC Design Verification Engineer III H-1B visas were approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What does the fiscal year mean here?
- Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2021). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →