Staff Design Engineer H-1B salaries — 275 certified filings (FY2016–FY2026)

12
Filings · FY2025
$155k
Median base · FY2025
$149k–$169k
Middle 50% · FY2025
Xilinx
Top sponsor · 68 all-time
FY

Staff Design Engineer: 275 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. In FY2025 the median base salary was $155k across 12 filings, with the middle 50% of offers between $149k and $169k. The biggest sponsors are Xilinx, Arm, Micron Technology; most filings are in San Jose, CA.

How much does a Staff Design Engineer make on an H-1B?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $155k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$50k$100k$150k$200k$250k’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26

How has Staff Design Engineer sponsorship changed?

31 certified filings in FY2016 → 12 in FY2026. The change column is each year against the one before.

Staff Design Engineer certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY2026120%$176k
FY2025120%$155k
FY2024120%$169k
FY202312−57%$145k
FY202228−22%$164k
FY202136−3%$155k
FY202037+6%$142k
FY201935+9%$148k
FY201832+14%$134k
FY201728−10%$135k
FY201631—$121k

Which companies sponsor H-1B Staff Design Engineers?

The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.

Top H-1B sponsors for Staff Design Engineer
#EmployerFilingsMedian base
1Xilinx68$158k
2Arm58$145k
3Micron Technology27$170k
4Marvell Semiconductor8$116k
5Analog Devices8$120k
6Ubilinx Technology6$152k
7Visa U.S.A.6$133k
8Alpha and Omega Semiconductor6$128k
9Texasldpc5$80k
10Silicon Laboratories5$155k

Where are H-1B Staff Design Engineer jobs located?

Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.

Top worksite cities for H-1B Staff Design Engineer roles
#CityFilingsMedian base
1San Jose, CA117$158k
2Austin, TX60$141k
3Santa Clara, CA25$132k
4Milpitas, CA15$132k
5San Diego, CA10$124k
6Sunnyvale, CA6$124k
7Wilmington, MA5$117k
8Bryan, TX5$80k
9Chandler, AZ4$129k
10Folsom, CA3$169k

Common questions about Staff Design Engineer H-1B salaries

What is the median H-1B salary for a Staff Design Engineer?
The median certified H-1B base salary for Staff Design Engineer is $155k (FY2025), from 12 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $127k and $163k.
Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Staff Design Engineers?
The top H-1B sponsors for Staff Design Engineer are Xilinx, Arm, Micron Technology.
Where are most H-1B Staff Design Engineer jobs located?
The top worksite locations for H-1B Staff Design Engineer roles are San Jose, CA, Austin, TX, Santa Clara, CA.
Does a certified LCA mean Staff Design Engineer H-1B visas were approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What does the fiscal year mean here?
Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.

Keep exploring

Browse all job titles →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2026). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →