Verasci — 2 certified H-1B filings (FY2020–FY2022)
- 1
- Filings · FY2022
- $35k
- Median base · FY2022
- Linguistic Data Monitor
- Top role · 1 all-time
- NC
- Top state · 2 all-time
Verasci filed 1 certified H-1B LCAs in FY2022, with a median base salary of $35k and the middle 50% of offers between $35k and $35k. Across all years it has 2 certified filings since FY2020, most often for Linguistic Data Monitor in North Carolina.
How much does Verasci pay H-1B workers?
Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $35k median in FY2022. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
How has Verasci's H-1B hiring changed by year?
1 certified filings in FY2020 → 1 in FY2022. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | 1 | 0% | $35k |
| FY2020 | 1 | — | $75k |
Which wage levels does Verasci file?
DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 50% of Verasci's filings sit at Level III–IV. A heavy I–II skew reads as entry-level or contractor-style hiring; a heavy IV skew as senior in-house roles — and higher levels earn more lottery entries.
Share of 2 filings with a wage level · all years
- Level I50.0%1
- Level III50.0%1
What jobs does Verasci sponsor for H-1B?
The most-filed job titles across all years (DOL titles, employer pay-grade codes stripped), with base-salary percentiles.
| Job title | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistic Data Monitor | 1 | $35k |
| Sr Clinical Specialist | 1 | $75k |
Where does Verasci hire H-1B workers?
Worksite states on the certified filings, all years. Deeper pink = more filings; hover a state for its figures.
| State | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| NC | 2 | $35k |
What has Verasci filed recently?
Every certified LCA on record for Verasci: job title, worksite, prevailing-wage level and the offered base salary.
| FY | Job title | Base salary |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Linguistic Data Monitor | $34,674 |
| 2020 | Sr Clinical Specialist | $75,000 |
Common questions about Verasci's H-1B filings
- How much does Verasci pay H-1B workers?
- Verasci's median certified H-1B base salary is $35k (FY2022), from 1 filings. See the full salary distribution and percentiles above.
- How many H-1B workers does Verasci sponsor?
- Verasci has 2 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications on record (FY2020–FY2022).
- What jobs does Verasci sponsor for H-1B?
- Verasci's most-sponsored H-1B roles include Linguistic Data Monitor, Sr Clinical Specialist.
- Where does Verasci hire H-1B workers?
- Verasci's top H-1B worksite states are NC.
- Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
- The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2020–FY2022). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →