Architect (Non-Licensed) H-1B salary at Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup — 38 certified filings (FY2016–FY2018)
- 20
- Filings · FY2018
- $57k
- Median base · FY2018
- $54k–$66k
- Middle 50% · FY2018
- −17%
- vs market median · all years
Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup filed 20 certified H-1B LCAs for Architect (Non-Licensed) in FY2018 (up 186% from the year before), with a median base salary of $57k and the middle 50% of offers between $54k and $66k. Across all years its $56k median is 17% below the $67k market median for Architect (Non-Licensed). It has filed 38 Architect (Non-Licensed) LCAs since FY2016, most often in San Francisco, CA.
How much does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup pay a Architect (Non-Licensed)?
Certified base salary for Architect (Non-Licensed) at Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $57k median in FY2018. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
Does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup pay Architect (Non-Licensed)s above the market?
Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's all-years median against every employer's certified Architect (Non-Licensed) LCAs — 17% below the market. Same cleaned DOL title, same base-salary definition, so the two rows compare like for like.
| Base salary for this title | Filings | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup | 38 | $56k |
| All employers · Architect (Non-Licensed) | 145 | $67k |
How has Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's Architect (Non-Licensed) hiring changed by year?
11 certified Architect (Non-Licensed) filings in FY2016 → 20 in FY2018. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2018 | 20 | +186% | $57k |
| FY2017 | 7 | −36% | $56k |
| FY2016 | 11 | — | $48k |
Which wage levels does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup file for Architect (Non-Licensed)?
DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 0% of Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's Architect (Non-Licensed) filings sit at Level III–IV. Higher levels earn more entries in the wage-weighted H-1B lottery.
Share of 12 Architect (Non-Licensed) filings with a wage level · all years
- Level I50.0%6
- Level II50.0%6
Where does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup hire H-1B Architect (Non-Licensed)s?
Worksite states and cities on the certified filings for this title, all years, with the median base salary at each.
| State | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| California | 13 | $58k |
| Texas | 8 | $49k |
| District of Columbia | 6 | $55k |
| Michigan | 5 | $45k |
| Illinois | 4 | $51k |
| Arizona | 2 | $36k |
| City | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| San Francisco, CA | 10 | $58k |
| Dallas, TX | 8 | $49k |
| Washington, DC | 6 | $55k |
| Detroit, MI | 5 | $45k |
| Chicago, IL | 4 | $51k |
| Los Angeles, CA | 3 | $58k |
| Phoenix, AZ | 2 | $36k |
Also filed as
Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's other sponsored titles, and the employers that file the most Architect (Non-Licensed) LCAs. All years.
Top Architect (Non-Licensed) sponsors
| Employer | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Smithgroup Inc. Subsidiary of Smithgroup | 105 | $73k |
| Smithgroupjjr Inc Sub of Smithgroup | 2 | $58k |
Common questions about Architect (Non-Licensed) H-1B pay at Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup
- How much does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup pay a Architect (Non-Licensed) on an H-1B?
- Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's median certified H-1B base salary for Architect (Non-Licensed) is $57k in FY2018, from 20 filings; the middle 50% of offers fall between $54k and $66k. Across all years the median is $56k.
- How many Architect (Non-Licensed) H-1B LCAs has Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup filed?
- Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup has 38 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Architect (Non-Licensed) on record (FY2016–FY2018), 20 of them in FY2018. That is 51% of its 74 certified filings across all titles.
- Does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup pay Architect (Non-Licensed)s above the market?
- Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's all-years median of $56k is 17% below the $67k median for Architect (Non-Licensed) across all H-1B employers (145 certified filings).
- Where does Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup hire H-1B Architect (Non-Licensed)s?
- Smithgroupjjr Inc Subsidiary of Smithgroup's Architect (Non-Licensed) LCAs name worksites mostly in California, Texas, District of Columbia; the top cities are San Francisco, CA, Dallas, TX, Washington, DC.
- Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
- The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2018). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →