Oetiker Tool — 1 certified H-1B filings (FY2017)

1
Filings · FY2017
$105k
Median base · FY2017
Application Manager
Top role · 1 all-time
CT
Top state · 1 all-time
FY

Oetiker Tool filed 1 certified H-1B LCAs in FY2017, with a median base salary of $105k and the middle 50% of offers between $105k and $105k. Across all years it has 1 certified filings since FY2017, most often for Application Manager in Connecticut.

How much does Oetiker Tool pay H-1B workers?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $105k median in FY2017. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$90k$100k$110k$120k’17

How has Oetiker Tool's H-1B hiring changed by year?

1 certified filings on record (FY2017).

Oetiker Tool certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY20171—$105k

Which wage levels does Oetiker Tool file?

DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 0% of Oetiker Tool's filings sit at Level III–IV. A heavy I–II skew reads as entry-level or contractor-style hiring; a heavy IV skew as senior in-house roles — and higher levels earn more lottery entries.

Share of 1 filings with a wage level · all years

100%
  • Level II100.0%1

What jobs does Oetiker Tool sponsor for H-1B?

The most-filed job titles across all years (DOL titles, employer pay-grade codes stripped), with base-salary percentiles.

Oetiker Tool most-sponsored H-1B job titles with base-salary percentiles
Job titleFilingsMedian base
Application Manager1$105k

Where does Oetiker Tool hire H-1B workers?

Worksite states on the certified filings, all years. Deeper pink = more filings; hover a state for its figures.

11Certified filings (log scale)
Oetiker Tool H-1B worksite states
StateFilingsMedian base
CT1$105k

What has Oetiker Tool filed recently?

Every certified LCA on record for Oetiker Tool: job title, worksite, prevailing-wage level and the offered base salary.

Oetiker Tool recent certified H-1B LCA filings
FYJob titleBase salary
2017Application Manager$105,000

Common questions about Oetiker Tool's H-1B filings

How much does Oetiker Tool pay H-1B workers?
Oetiker Tool's median certified H-1B base salary is $105k (FY2017), from 1 filings. See the full salary distribution and percentiles above.
How many H-1B workers does Oetiker Tool sponsor?
Oetiker Tool has 1 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications on record (FY2017).
What jobs does Oetiker Tool sponsor for H-1B?
Oetiker Tool's most-sponsored H-1B roles include Application Manager.
Where does Oetiker Tool hire H-1B workers?
Oetiker Tool's top H-1B worksite states are CT.
Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.

Keep exploring

Browse all sponsors →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2017). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →