Quality Assurance Engineer II H-1B salary at Audible — 67 certified filings (FY2018–FY2026)
- 11
- Filings · FY2025
- $136k
- Median base · FY2025
- $125k–$154k
- Middle 50% · FY2025
- +7%
- vs market median · all years
Audible filed 11 certified H-1B LCAs for Quality Assurance Engineer II in FY2025, with a median base salary of $136k and the middle 50% of offers between $125k and $154k. Across all years its $140k median is 7% above the $131k market median for Quality Assurance Engineer II. It has filed 67 Quality Assurance Engineer II LCAs since FY2018, most often in Newark, NJ.
How much does Audible pay a Quality Assurance Engineer II?
Certified base salary for Quality Assurance Engineer II at Audible by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $136k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
Does Audible pay Quality Assurance Engineer IIs above the market?
Audible's all-years median against every employer's certified Quality Assurance Engineer II LCAs — 7% above the market. Same cleaned DOL title, same base-salary definition, so the two rows compare like for like.
| Base salary for this title | Filings | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Audible | 67 | $140k |
| All employers · Quality Assurance Engineer II | 2,368 | $131k |
How has Audible's Quality Assurance Engineer II hiring changed by year?
2 certified Quality Assurance Engineer II filings in FY2018 → 5 in FY2026. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 5 | −55% | $125k |
| FY2025 | 11 | +10% | $136k |
| FY2024 | 10 | +67% | $141k |
| FY2023 | 6 | −60% | $136k |
| FY2022 | 15 | +200% | $146k |
| FY2021 | 5 | −44% | $125k |
| FY2020 | 9 | +125% | $139k |
| FY2019 | 4 | +100% | $124k |
| FY2018 | 2 | — | $120k |
Which wage levels does Audible file for Quality Assurance Engineer II?
DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 2% of Audible's Quality Assurance Engineer II filings sit at Level III–IV. Higher levels earn more entries in the wage-weighted H-1B lottery.
Share of 66 Quality Assurance Engineer II filings with a wage level · all years
- Level I6.1%4
- Level II92.4%61
- Level IV1.5%1
Where does Audible hire H-1B Quality Assurance Engineer IIs?
Worksite states and cities on the certified filings for this title, all years, with the median base salary at each.
| State | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | 54 | $139k |
| California | 6 | $119k |
| Massachusetts | 5 | $141k |
| Texas | 2 | $153k |
| City | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Newark, NJ | 54 | $139k |
| Culver City, CA | 6 | $119k |
| Cambridge, MA | 5 | $141k |
| Plano, TX | 2 | $153k |
Also filed as
Audible's other sponsored titles, and the employers that file the most Quality Assurance Engineer II LCAs. All years.
Other titles at Audible
| Job title | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Software Development Engineer II | 400 | $158k |
| Software Development Engineer I | 220 | $125k |
| Software Development Engineer | 90 | $116k |
| Software Development Engineer III | 41 | $185k |
| Quality Assurance Engineer I | 31 | $112k |
Top Quality Assurance Engineer II sponsors
| Employer | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Services | 1,679 | $134k |
| A2z Development Center | 151 | $135k |
| Amazon Corporate | 140 | $120k |
| Amazon Web Services | 67 | $135k |
| Amazon Development Center U.S. | 16 | $140k |
| Amazon Fulfillment Services | 14 | $120k |
| Curriculum Associates | 12 | $115k |
| Comscore | 10 | $94k |
| Amazon Robotics | 9 | $113k |
Common questions about Quality Assurance Engineer II H-1B pay at Audible
- How much does Audible pay a Quality Assurance Engineer II on an H-1B?
- Audible's median certified H-1B base salary for Quality Assurance Engineer II is $136k in FY2025, from 11 filings; the middle 50% of offers fall between $125k and $154k. Across all years the median is $140k.
- How many Quality Assurance Engineer II H-1B LCAs has Audible filed?
- Audible has 67 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Quality Assurance Engineer II on record (FY2018–FY2026), 5 of them in FY2026. That is 5% of its 1,317 certified filings across all titles.
- Does Audible pay Quality Assurance Engineer IIs above the market?
- Audible's all-years median of $140k is 7% above the $131k median for Quality Assurance Engineer II across all H-1B employers (2,368 certified filings).
- Where does Audible hire H-1B Quality Assurance Engineer IIs?
- Audible's Quality Assurance Engineer II LCAs name worksites mostly in New Jersey, California, Massachusetts; the top cities are Newark, NJ, Culver City, CA, Cambridge, MA.
- Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
- The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2018–FY2026). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →