Technology Lead - US - Practitioner H-1B salaries — 13,122 certified filings (FY2016–FY2024)

13,122
Filings · all years
$78k
Median base · all years
$73k–$83k
Middle 50% · all years
Infosys
Top sponsor · 13,109 all-time
FY

Technology Lead - US - Practitioner: 13,122 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. The all-years median base salary is $78k (middle 50%: $73k–$83k). The biggest sponsors are Infosys, Infosys Public Services; most filings are in Sunnyvale, CA.

How much does a Technology Lead - US - Practitioner make on an H-1B?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $78k median in all years. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$40k$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24

How has Technology Lead - US - Practitioner sponsorship changed?

427 certified filings in FY2016 → 34 in FY2024. The change column is each year against the one before.

Technology Lead - US - Practitioner certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY202434−70%$76k
FY2023114−29%$73k
FY2022160−25%$75k
FY2021214−65%$72k
FY2020614−92%$78k
FY20197,428+291%$79k
FY20181,898−15%$78k
FY20172,233+423%$78k
FY2016427—$78k

Which companies sponsor H-1B Technology Lead - US - Practitioners?

The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.

Top H-1B sponsors for Technology Lead - US - Practitioner
#EmployerFilingsMedian base
1Infosys13,109$78k
2Infosys Public Services13$77k

Where are H-1B Technology Lead - US - Practitioner jobs located?

Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.

Top worksite cities for H-1B Technology Lead - US - Practitioner roles
#CityFilingsMedian base
1Sunnyvale, CA790$97k
2Phoenix, AZ544$73k
3Houston, TX436$82k
4Richardson, TX429$81k
5Atlanta, GA399$74k
6Hartford, CT391$83k
7Plano, TX359$81k
8Tampa, FL298$69k
9Redmond, WA286$85k
10Charlotte, NC284$79k

Common questions about Technology Lead - US - Practitioner H-1B salaries

What is the median H-1B salary for a Technology Lead - US - Practitioner?
The median certified H-1B base salary for Technology Lead - US - Practitioner is $78k (all years), from 13,122 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $73k and $83k.
Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Technology Lead - US - Practitioners?
The top H-1B sponsors for Technology Lead - US - Practitioner are Infosys, Infosys Public Services.
Where are most H-1B Technology Lead - US - Practitioner jobs located?
The top worksite locations for H-1B Technology Lead - US - Practitioner roles are Sunnyvale, CA, Phoenix, AZ, Houston, TX.
Does a certified LCA mean Technology Lead - US - Practitioner H-1B visas were approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What does the fiscal year mean here?
Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.

Keep exploring

Browse all job titles →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2024). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →