Technology Architect - US - Professional H-1B salaries — 341 certified filings (FY2017–FY2024)
- 341
- Filings · all years
- $93k
- Median base · all years
- $86k–$99k
- Middle 50% · all years
- Infosys
- Top sponsor · 341 all-time
Technology Architect - US - Professional: 341 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2017. The all-years median base salary is $93k (middle 50%: $86k–$99k). The biggest sponsors are Infosys; most filings are in Plano, TX.
How much does a Technology Architect - US - Professional make on an H-1B?
Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $93k median in all years. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
How has Technology Architect - US - Professional sponsorship changed?
108 certified filings in FY2017 → 1 in FY2024. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 1 | 0% | $171k |
| FY2023 | 1 | −50% | $171k |
| FY2022 | 2 | −67% | $95k |
| FY2021 | 6 | −65% | $93k |
| FY2020 | 17 | −86% | $93k |
| FY2019 | 124 | +51% | $96k |
| FY2018 | 82 | −24% | $93k |
| FY2017 | 108 | — | $93k |
Which companies sponsor H-1B Technology Architect - US - Professionals?
The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.
| # | Employer | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Infosys | 341 | $93k |
Where are H-1B Technology Architect - US - Professional jobs located?
Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.
| # | City | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plano, TX | 20 | $98k |
| 2 | Sunnyvale, CA | 17 | $124k |
| 3 | Irvine, CA | 12 | $93k |
| 4 | Phoenix, AZ | 10 | $84k |
| 5 | Charlotte, NC | 10 | $88k |
| 6 | Bellevue, WA | 9 | $95k |
| 7 | Irving, TX | 9 | $98k |
| 8 | Hartford, CT | 9 | $107k |
| 9 | Tampa, FL | 9 | $82k |
| 10 | Atlanta, GA | 9 | $90k |
Common questions about Technology Architect - US - Professional H-1B salaries
- What is the median H-1B salary for a Technology Architect - US - Professional?
- The median certified H-1B base salary for Technology Architect - US - Professional is $93k (all years), from 341 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $86k and $99k.
- Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Technology Architect - US - Professionals?
- The top H-1B sponsors for Technology Architect - US - Professional are Infosys.
- Where are most H-1B Technology Architect - US - Professional jobs located?
- The top worksite locations for H-1B Technology Architect - US - Professional roles are Plano, TX, Sunnyvale, CA, Irvine, CA.
- Does a certified LCA mean Technology Architect - US - Professional H-1B visas were approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What does the fiscal year mean here?
- Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2017–FY2024). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →