Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner H-1B salaries — 2,470 certified filings (FY2016–FY2025)

2
Filings · FY2025
$68k
Median base · FY2025
$68k–$93k
Middle 50% · FY2025
Infosys
Top sponsor · 2,470 all-time
FY

Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner: 2,470 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. In FY2025 the median base salary was $68k across 2 filings, with the middle 50% of offers between $68k and $93k. The biggest sponsors are Infosys; most filings are in Tampa, FL.

How much does a Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner make on an H-1B?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $68k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$60k$70k$80k$90k$100k$110k’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25

How has Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner sponsorship changed?

104 certified filings in FY2016 → 2 in FY2025. The change column is each year against the one before.

Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY20252−80%$68k
FY202410−50%$84k
FY202320−57%$83k
FY202247−11%$75k
FY202153−72%$71k
FY2020186−81%$76k
FY2019986+134%$74k
FY2018422−34%$73k
FY2017640+515%$74k
FY2016104—$74k

Which companies sponsor H-1B Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioners?

The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.

Top H-1B sponsors for Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner
#EmployerFilingsMedian base
1Infosys2,470$74k

Where are H-1B Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner jobs located?

Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.

Top worksite cities for H-1B Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner roles
#CityFilingsMedian base
1Tampa, FL102$69k
2Charlotte, NC86$71k
3Atlanta, GA78$73k
4Hartford, CT76$90k
5Irvine, CA75$74k
6Jersey City, NJ71$74k
7Sunnyvale, CA67$96k
8Phoenix, AZ66$69k
9Chicago, IL65$77k
10Austin, TX58$71k

Common questions about Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner H-1B salaries

What is the median H-1B salary for a Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner?
The median certified H-1B base salary for Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner is $68k (FY2025), from 2 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $71k and $78k.
Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioners?
The top H-1B sponsors for Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner are Infosys.
Where are most H-1B Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner jobs located?
The top worksite locations for H-1B Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner roles are Tampa, FL, Charlotte, NC, Atlanta, GA.
Does a certified LCA mean Technical Test Lead - US - Practitioner H-1B visas were approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What does the fiscal year mean here?
Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.

Keep exploring

Browse all job titles →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2025). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →