Python Developer H-1B salaries — 1,416 certified filings (FY2016–FY2026)

158
Filings · FY2025
$101k
Median base · FY2025
$92k–$113k
Middle 50% · FY2025
Career Soft Solutions
Top sponsor · 47 all-time
FY

Python Developer: 1,416 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. In FY2025 the median base salary was $101k across 158 filings, with the middle 50% of offers between $92k and $113k. The biggest sponsors are Career Soft Solutions, Svk Technology Solutions, Squad Software; most filings are in Austin, TX.

How much does a Python Developer make on an H-1B?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $101k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$40k$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k$160k’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26

How has Python Developer sponsorship changed?

14 certified filings in FY2016 → 120 in FY2026. The change column is each year against the one before.

Python Developer certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY2026120−24%$109k
FY2025158+7%$101k
FY2024147−3%$97k
FY2023151−21%$95k
FY2022192+52%$94k
FY2021126−7%$94k
FY2020136−32%$92k
FY2019199+62%$92k
FY2018123+146%$88k
FY201750+257%$72k
FY201614—$71k

Which companies sponsor H-1B Python Developers?

The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.

Top H-1B sponsors for Python Developer
#EmployerFilingsMedian base
1Career Soft Solutions47$99k
2Svk Technology Solutions33$89k
3Squad Software30$99k
4Pro Tek Consulting30$83k
5Emonics28$80k
6Collaborate Solutions21$94k
7Ventois20$88k
8I 5 Tech19$88k
9Eniac Systems18$89k
10Namo Technologies17$85k

Where are H-1B Python Developer jobs located?

Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.

Top worksite cities for H-1B Python Developer roles
#CityFilingsMedian base
1Austin, TX71$89k
2Irving, TX57$94k
3New York, NY55$97k
4Plano, TX50$96k
5San Jose, CA43$91k
6Charlotte, NC32$90k
7Mclean, VA26$100k
8Houston, TX25$92k
9Jersey City, NJ25$103k
10Atlanta, GA23$86k

Common questions about Python Developer H-1B salaries

What is the median H-1B salary for a Python Developer?
The median certified H-1B base salary for Python Developer is $101k (FY2025), from 158 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $84k and $102k.
Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Python Developers?
The top H-1B sponsors for Python Developer are Career Soft Solutions, Svk Technology Solutions, Squad Software.
Where are most H-1B Python Developer jobs located?
The top worksite locations for H-1B Python Developer roles are Austin, TX, Irving, TX, New York, NY.
Does a certified LCA mean Python Developer H-1B visas were approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What does the fiscal year mean here?
Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.

Keep exploring

Browse all job titles →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2026). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →