Engineer-In-Training H-1B salaries — 101 certified filings (FY2016–FY2026)

9
Filings · FY2025
$83k
Median base · FY2025
$80k–$87k
Middle 50% · FY2025
L a Fuess Partners
Top sponsor · 22 all-time
FY

Engineer-In-Training: 101 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. In FY2025 the median base salary was $83k across 9 filings, with the middle 50% of offers between $80k and $87k. The biggest sponsors are L a Fuess Partners, Consor Engineers, Consor North America; most filings are in Dallas, TX.

How much does a Engineer-In-Training make on an H-1B?

Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $83k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$20k$40k$60k$80k$100k$120k’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26

How has Engineer-In-Training sponsorship changed?

6 certified filings in FY2016 → 7 in FY2026. The change column is each year against the one before.

Engineer-In-Training certified H-1B filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY20267−22%$85k
FY20259+50%$83k
FY202460%$72k
FY202360%$78k
FY20226−50%$74k
FY202112−29%$70k
FY202017+31%$63k
FY201913+44%$62k
FY20189−10%$64k
FY201710+67%$60k
FY20166—$53k

Which companies sponsor H-1B Engineer-In-Trainings?

The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.

Top H-1B sponsors for Engineer-In-Training
#EmployerFilingsMedian base
1L a Fuess Partners22$67k
2Consor Engineers12$71k
3Consor North America8$83k
4Ponce-Fuess Engineering8$65k
5Othon7$66k
6Hess-Rountree4$54k
7Blue Ridge Design4$74k
8Neel-Schaffer4$94k
9Civilcorp4$82k
10Ardurra Group3$70k

Where are H-1B Engineer-In-Training jobs located?

Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.

Top worksite cities for H-1B Engineer-In-Training roles
#CityFilingsMedian base
1Dallas, TX36$67k
2Houston, TX9$69k
3Atlanta, GA5$84k
4Austin, TX5$80k
5Winchester, VA4$74k
6Richardson, TX4$70k
7Phoenix, AZ4$54k
8Corpus Christi, TX4$62k
9Albuquerque, NM3$61k
10Arlington, TX3$96k

Common questions about Engineer-In-Training H-1B salaries

What is the median H-1B salary for a Engineer-In-Training?
The median certified H-1B base salary for Engineer-In-Training is $83k (FY2025), from 9 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $62k and $78k.
Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Engineer-In-Trainings?
The top H-1B sponsors for Engineer-In-Training are L a Fuess Partners, Consor Engineers, Consor North America.
Where are most H-1B Engineer-In-Training jobs located?
The top worksite locations for H-1B Engineer-In-Training roles are Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, Atlanta, GA.
Does a certified LCA mean Engineer-In-Training H-1B visas were approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What does the fiscal year mean here?
Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.

Keep exploring

Browse all job titles →

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2026). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →