Technical Program Management H-1B salary at Microsoft — 766 certified filings (FY2022–FY2026)

311
Filings · FY2025
$176k
Median base · FY2025
$160k–$193k
Middle 50% · FY2025
+1%
vs market median · all years

Microsoft filed 311 certified H-1B LCAs for Technical Program Management in FY2025, with a median base salary of $176k and the middle 50% of offers between $160k and $193k. Across all years its $175k median is in line with the $174k market median for Technical Program Management. It has filed 766 Technical Program Management LCAs since FY2022, most often in Redmond, WA.

How much does Microsoft pay a Technical Program Management?

Certified base salary for Technical Program Management at Microsoft by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $176k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.

$125k$150k$175k$200k$225k$250k’22’24’25’26

Does Microsoft pay Technical Program Managements above the market?

Microsoft's all-years median against every employer's certified Technical Program Management LCAs — in line with the market. Same cleaned DOL title, same base-salary definition, so the two rows compare like for like.

Technical Program Management base salary: Microsoft versus all H-1B employers
Base salary for this titleFilingsMedian
Microsoft766$175k
All employers · Technical Program Management816$174k

How has Microsoft's Technical Program Management hiring changed by year?

9 certified Technical Program Management filings in FY2022 → 162 in FY2026. The change column is each year against the one before.

Microsoft certified H-1B Technical Program Management filings and base salary by fiscal year
Fiscal yearFilingsvs prior FYMedian base
FY2026162−48%$185k
FY2025311+10%$176k
FY2024284+3056%$169k
FY20229—$156k

Which wage levels does Microsoft file for Technical Program Management?

DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 66% of Microsoft's Technical Program Management filings sit at Level III–IV. Higher levels earn more entries in the wage-weighted H-1B lottery.

Share of 764 Technical Program Management filings with a wage level · all years

29%
50%
16%
  • Level I5.2%40
  • Level II29.2%223
  • Level III50.0%382
  • Level IV15.6%119

Where does Microsoft hire H-1B Technical Program Managements?

Worksite states and cities on the certified filings for this title, all years, with the median base salary at each.

Microsoft Technical Program Management H-1B worksite states
StateFilingsMedian base
Washington549$176k
California55$202k
Georgia39$146k
Texas38$160k
New York12$151k
North Carolina9$173k
Virginia9$192k
Illinois8$168k
Microsoft Technical Program Management H-1B worksite cities
CityFilingsMedian base
Redmond, WA515$176k
Atlanta, GA28$142k
Mountain View, CA27$208k
Austin, TX11$168k
New York, NY11$159k
Bothell, WA9$160k
Irving, TX9$155k
Bellevue, WA8$173k

Also filed as

Microsoft's other sponsored titles, and the employers that file the most Technical Program Management LCAs. All years.

Other titles at Microsoft

Other H-1B job titles sponsored by Microsoft
Job titleFilingsMedian base
Software Engineer29,968$142k
Software Engineering12,539$170k
Senior Software Engineer3,271$155k
Program Manager1,799$134k
Data and Applied Scientist1,788$141k
Senior Program Manager1,628$162k
Product Management1,069$176k
Applied Sciences959$173k
Product Manager920$169k
Data Science808$164k

Top Technical Program Management sponsors

Top H-1B sponsors for Technical Program Management
EmployerFilingsMedian base
Apple45$167k
Nvidia1$169k
Credit Karma1$292k
Anthropic Pbc1$435k
Meta Platforms1$175k
Sterrofox1$67k

Common questions about Technical Program Management H-1B pay at Microsoft

How much does Microsoft pay a Technical Program Management on an H-1B?
Microsoft's median certified H-1B base salary for Technical Program Management is $176k in FY2025, from 311 filings; the middle 50% of offers fall between $160k and $193k. Across all years the median is $175k.
How many Technical Program Management H-1B LCAs has Microsoft filed?
Microsoft has 766 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Technical Program Management on record (FY2022–FY2026), 162 of them in FY2026. That is 1% of its 77,758 certified filings across all titles.
Does Microsoft pay Technical Program Managements above the market?
Microsoft's all-years median of $175k is in line with the $174k median for Technical Program Management across all H-1B employers (816 certified filings).
Where does Microsoft hire H-1B Technical Program Managements?
Microsoft's Technical Program Management LCAs name worksites mostly in Washington, California, Georgia; the top cities are Redmond, WA, Atlanta, GA, Mountain View, CA.
Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
What salary do these figures show?
The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.

Keep exploring

Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2022–FY2026). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →