Software Development Engineer II H-1B salary at Liveperson — 49 certified filings (FY2019–FY2025)
- 1
- Filings · FY2025
- $153k
- Median base · FY2025
- $153k–$153k
- Middle 50% · FY2025
- ±0%
- vs market median · all years
Liveperson filed 1 certified H-1B LCAs for Software Development Engineer II in FY2025 (down 83% from the year before), with a median base salary of $153k and the middle 50% of offers between $153k and $153k. Across all years its $152k median is in line with the $152k market median for Software Development Engineer II. It has filed 49 Software Development Engineer II LCAs since FY2019, most often in New York, NY.
How much does Liveperson pay a Software Development Engineer II?
Certified base salary for Software Development Engineer II at Liveperson by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $153k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
Does Liveperson pay Software Development Engineer IIs above the market?
Liveperson's all-years median against every employer's certified Software Development Engineer II LCAs — in line with the market. Same cleaned DOL title, same base-salary definition, so the two rows compare like for like.
| Base salary for this title | Filings | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Liveperson | 49 | $152k |
| All employers · Software Development Engineer II | 25,234 | $152k |
How has Liveperson's Software Development Engineer II hiring changed by year?
5 certified Software Development Engineer II filings in FY2019 → 1 in FY2025. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1 | −83% | $153k |
| FY2024 | 6 | −33% | $145k |
| FY2023 | 9 | −18% | $147k |
| FY2022 | 11 | +10% | $155k |
| FY2021 | 10 | +43% | $150k |
| FY2020 | 7 | +40% | $160k |
| FY2019 | 5 | — | $150k |
Which wage levels does Liveperson file for Software Development Engineer II?
DOL prevailing-wage levels I–IV approximate experience tiers (I = entry, IV = fully competent). 82% of Liveperson's Software Development Engineer II filings sit at Level III–IV. Higher levels earn more entries in the wage-weighted H-1B lottery.
Share of 49 Software Development Engineer II filings with a wage level · all years
- Level II18.4%9
- Level III49.0%24
- Level IV32.7%16
Where does Liveperson hire H-1B Software Development Engineer IIs?
Worksite states and cities on the certified filings for this title, all years, with the median base salary at each.
| State | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 35 | $150k |
| Washington | 11 | $160k |
| California | 2 | $140k |
| Texas | 1 | $140k |
| City | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| New York, NY | 34 | $150k |
| Seattle, WA | 11 | $160k |
| Mountain View, CA | 2 | $140k |
| Amherst, NY | 1 | $135k |
| Austin, TX | 1 | $140k |
Also filed as
Liveperson's other sponsored titles, and the employers that file the most Software Development Engineer II LCAs. All years.
Other titles at Liveperson
| Job title | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Software Development Engineer I | 39 | $124k |
Top Software Development Engineer II sponsors
| Employer | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Services | 15,890 | $154k |
| Amazon Development Center U.S. | 2,691 | $162k |
| Amazon Web Services | 1,983 | $152k |
| Amazon Corporate | 1,382 | $132k |
| A2z Development Center | 507 | $145k |
| Amazon Data Services | 420 | $167k |
| Audible | 400 | $158k |
| Amazon Fulfillment Services | 228 | $132k |
| A9 Com | 153 | $150k |
| Twitch Interactive | 146 | $160k |
Common questions about Software Development Engineer II H-1B pay at Liveperson
- How much does Liveperson pay a Software Development Engineer II on an H-1B?
- Liveperson's median certified H-1B base salary for Software Development Engineer II is $153k in FY2025, from 1 filings; the middle 50% of offers fall between $153k and $153k. Across all years the median is $152k.
- How many Software Development Engineer II H-1B LCAs has Liveperson filed?
- Liveperson has 49 certified H-1B Labor Condition Applications for Software Development Engineer II on record (FY2019–FY2025), 1 of them in FY2025. That is 19% of its 253 certified filings across all titles.
- Does Liveperson pay Software Development Engineer IIs above the market?
- Liveperson's all-years median of $152k is in line with the $152k median for Software Development Engineer II across all H-1B employers (25,234 certified filings).
- Where does Liveperson hire H-1B Software Development Engineer IIs?
- Liveperson's Software Development Engineer II LCAs name worksites mostly in New York, Washington, California; the top cities are New York, NY, Seattle, WA, Mountain View, CA.
- Does a certified LCA mean an H-1B visa was approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What do prevailing-wage levels I–IV mean?
- The Department of Labor assigns each LCA an OES wage level from I (entry) to IV (fully competent) for the occupation and area. Under the FY2027 wage-weighted H-1B lottery rule, a higher level earns more selection entries, so an employer's level mix is a proxy for how senior its sponsored roles are.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2019–FY2025). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →