Data and Policy Analyst III H-1B salaries — 70 certified filings (FY2016–FY2025)
- 4
- Filings · FY2025
- $85k
- Median base · FY2025
- $85k–$85k
- Middle 50% · FY2025
- The Sphere Institute
- Top sponsor · 67 all-time
Data and Policy Analyst III: 70 certified H-1B LCAs since FY2016. In FY2025 the median base salary was $85k across 4 filings, with the middle 50% of offers between $85k and $85k. The biggest sponsors are The Sphere Institute, Acumen; most filings are in Burlingame, CA.
How much does a Data and Policy Analyst III make on an H-1B?
Certified base salary by fiscal year: each box is the p25–p75 range, the heavy line the median, the whiskers reach p10–p90. $85k median in FY2025. Base pay only — hover a year for its figures.
How has Data and Policy Analyst III sponsorship changed?
2 certified filings in FY2016 → 4 in FY2025. The change column is each year against the one before.
| Fiscal year | Filings | vs prior FY | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | −71% | $85k |
| FY2024 | 14 | +56% | $85k |
| FY2023 | 9 | +13% | $70k |
| FY2022 | 8 | +300% | $70k |
| FY2021 | 2 | −85% | $70k |
| FY2020 | 13 | +30% | $70k |
| FY2019 | 10 | +150% | $70k |
| FY2018 | 4 | 0% | $70k |
| FY2017 | 4 | +100% | $70k |
| FY2016 | 2 | — | $50k |
Which companies sponsor H-1B Data and Policy Analyst IIIs?
The employers with the most certified filings, all years, with their median base salary. Open any employer for its full profile.
| # | Employer | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Sphere Institute | 67 | $70k |
| 2 | Acumen | 3 | $72k |
Where are H-1B Data and Policy Analyst III jobs located?
Worksite cities with the most certified filings for this title, all years.
| # | City | Filings | Median base |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burlingame, CA | 34 | $70k |
| 2 | Washington, DC | 14 | $72k |
| 3 | Los Angeles, CA | 9 | $70k |
| 4 | Durham, NC | 1 | $85k |
| 5 | Leesburg, VA | 1 | $70k |
| 6 | Bellevue, WA | 1 | $70k |
| 7 | Brooklyn, NY | 1 | $85k |
| 8 | Cambridge, MA | 1 | $85k |
| 9 | Tustin, CA | 1 | $70k |
| 10 | Alexandria, VA | 1 | $85k |
Common questions about Data and Policy Analyst III H-1B salaries
- What is the median H-1B salary for a Data and Policy Analyst III?
- The median certified H-1B base salary for Data and Policy Analyst III is $85k (FY2025), from 4 filings. Across all years the middle 50% earn between $70k and $85k.
- Which companies sponsor the most H-1B Data and Policy Analyst IIIs?
- The top H-1B sponsors for Data and Policy Analyst III are The Sphere Institute, Acumen.
- Where are most H-1B Data and Policy Analyst III jobs located?
- The top worksite locations for H-1B Data and Policy Analyst III roles are Burlingame, CA, Washington, DC, Los Angeles, CA.
- Does a certified LCA mean Data and Policy Analyst III H-1B visas were approved?
- No. A Labor Condition Application (LCA) is the Department of Labor attestation an employer must have certified before filing an H-1B petition with USCIS. It records the job, worksite and offered wage, but not whether the petition was filed, selected in the lottery, or approved. Filing counts measure intent to sponsor, not headcount.
- What salary do these figures show?
- The base annual wage offered on the certified LCA, converted to a yearly amount. Bonus, equity, overtime and benefits are not included, so total compensation is typically higher. Figures are medians and percentiles over certified filings; wages above $5,000,000 a year are excluded as data-entry errors.
- What does the fiscal year mean here?
- Years are U.S. government fiscal years, October to September: FY2025 runs from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025. This matches how the Department of Labor publishes the disclosure files. The most recent year may be partial until its final quarter is released.
Keep exploring
Calculate your H-1B lottery odds →orCheck out the insights →
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — certified LCA disclosure data through June 2026 (FY2016–FY2025). An LCA is not an approved visa; pay figures are base salary and exclude bonus and equity. Methodology →